<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A discussion with Martin Parr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allphotographers.wordpress.com/2007/05/02/a-discussion-with-martin-parr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allphotographers.wordpress.com/2007/05/02/a-discussion-with-martin-parr/</link>
	<description>tous photographes !</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jackieboy</title>
		<link>http://allphotographers.wordpress.com/2007/05/02/a-discussion-with-martin-parr/#comment-4430</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackieboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allphotographers.wordpress.com/2007/05/02/a-discussion-with-martin-parr/#comment-4430</guid>
		<description>I find the post by immegusia puzzling.

1. What does his commentary have to do with Martin Parr?

2. The English is so atrocious that I can't make out whatever point he/she is trying to make.

3. See point 1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find the post by immegusia puzzling.</p>
<p>1. What does his commentary have to do with Martin Parr?</p>
<p>2. The English is so atrocious that I can&#8217;t make out whatever point he/she is trying to make.</p>
<p>3. See point 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Idetrorce</title>
		<link>http://allphotographers.wordpress.com/2007/05/02/a-discussion-with-martin-parr/#comment-4216</link>
		<dc:creator>Idetrorce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 00:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allphotographers.wordpress.com/2007/05/02/a-discussion-with-martin-parr/#comment-4216</guid>
		<description>very interesting, but I don't agree with you 
Idetrorce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting, but I don&#8217;t agree with you<br />
Idetrorce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naisioxerloro</title>
		<link>http://allphotographers.wordpress.com/2007/05/02/a-discussion-with-martin-parr/#comment-4107</link>
		<dc:creator>naisioxerloro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allphotographers.wordpress.com/2007/05/02/a-discussion-with-martin-parr/#comment-4107</guid>
		<description>Hi. 
Good design, who make it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.<br />
Good design, who make it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: immegusia</title>
		<link>http://allphotographers.wordpress.com/2007/05/02/a-discussion-with-martin-parr/#comment-4026</link>
		<dc:creator>immegusia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 09:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allphotographers.wordpress.com/2007/05/02/a-discussion-with-martin-parr/#comment-4026</guid>
		<description>Two new studies show why some people are more attractive for members of the opposite sex than others. 
 
The University of Florida, Florida State University found that physically attractive people almost instantly attract the attention of the interlocutor, sobesednitsy with them, literally, it is difficult to make eye. This conclusion was reached by a series of psychological experiments, which were determined by the people who believe in sending the first seconds after the acquaintance. Here, a curious feature: single, unmarried experimental preferred to look at the guys, beauty opposite sex, and family, people most often by representatives of their sex. 
 
The authors believe that this feature developed a behavior as a result of the evolution: a man trying to find a decent pair to acquire offspring. If this is resolved, he wondered potential rivals. Detailed information about this magazine will be published Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 
 
In turn, a joint study of the Rockefeller University, Rockefeller University and Duke University, Duke University in North Carolina revealed that women are perceived differently by men smell. During experiments studied the perception of women one of the ingredients of male pheromone-androstenona smell, which is contained in urine or sweat. 
 
The results were startling: women are part of this repugnant odor, and the other part is very attractive, resembling the smell of vanilla, and the third group have not felt any smell. The authors argue that the reason is that the differences in the receptor responsible for the olfactory system, from different people are different. 
 
It has long been proven that mammals (including human) odor is one way of attracting the attention of representatives of the opposite sex. A detailed article about the journal Nature will publish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two new studies show why some people are more attractive for members of the opposite sex than others. </p>
<p>The University of Florida, Florida State University found that physically attractive people almost instantly attract the attention of the interlocutor, sobesednitsy with them, literally, it is difficult to make eye. This conclusion was reached by a series of psychological experiments, which were determined by the people who believe in sending the first seconds after the acquaintance. Here, a curious feature: single, unmarried experimental preferred to look at the guys, beauty opposite sex, and family, people most often by representatives of their sex. </p>
<p>The authors believe that this feature developed a behavior as a result of the evolution: a man trying to find a decent pair to acquire offspring. If this is resolved, he wondered potential rivals. Detailed information about this magazine will be published Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. </p>
<p>In turn, a joint study of the Rockefeller University, Rockefeller University and Duke University, Duke University in North Carolina revealed that women are perceived differently by men smell. During experiments studied the perception of women one of the ingredients of male pheromone-androstenona smell, which is contained in urine or sweat. </p>
<p>The results were startling: women are part of this repugnant odor, and the other part is very attractive, resembling the smell of vanilla, and the third group have not felt any smell. The authors argue that the reason is that the differences in the receptor responsible for the olfactory system, from different people are different. </p>
<p>It has long been proven that mammals (including human) odor is one way of attracting the attention of representatives of the opposite sex. A detailed article about the journal Nature will publish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: late breakfast &#187; Blog Archive &#187; l&#8217;evoluzione della rivoluzione</title>
		<link>http://allphotographers.wordpress.com/2007/05/02/a-discussion-with-martin-parr/#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>late breakfast &#187; Blog Archive &#187; l&#8217;evoluzione della rivoluzione</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 00:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allphotographers.wordpress.com/2007/05/02/a-discussion-with-martin-parr/#comment-564</guid>
		<description>[...] una lunga intervista a martin parr (via) [mp3, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] una lunga intervista a martin parr (via) [mp3, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://allphotographers.wordpress.com/2007/05/02/a-discussion-with-martin-parr/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 16:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allphotographers.wordpress.com/2007/05/02/a-discussion-with-martin-parr/#comment-532</guid>
		<description>A great web blog thanks for this info.  I will tell a few friends about this site as its a great read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great web blog thanks for this info.  I will tell a few friends about this site as its a great read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interview with Martin Parr on hypernarrative.com, a weblog by Wilbert Baan about Art, Media and Technology (v. 3.6)</title>
		<link>http://allphotographers.wordpress.com/2007/05/02/a-discussion-with-martin-parr/#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator>Interview with Martin Parr on hypernarrative.com, a weblog by Wilbert Baan about Art, Media and Technology (v. 3.6)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 07:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allphotographers.wordpress.com/2007/05/02/a-discussion-with-martin-parr/#comment-523</guid>
		<description>[...] Listen to the interview with Martin Parr about photography, Flickr and vernacular photography published at weareallphotographersnow [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Listen to the interview with Martin Parr about photography, Flickr and vernacular photography published at weareallphotographersnow [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SHANE LAVALETTE / JOURNAL &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Nobody Likes Change Except A Wet Baby</title>
		<link>http://allphotographers.wordpress.com/2007/05/02/a-discussion-with-martin-parr/#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>SHANE LAVALETTE / JOURNAL &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Nobody Likes Change Except A Wet Baby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 16:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allphotographers.wordpress.com/2007/05/02/a-discussion-with-martin-parr/#comment-516</guid>
		<description>[...] As part of We Are All Photographers Now!, Martin Parr gave a solo talk. The talk was posted on the WAAPN blog: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As part of We Are All Photographers Now!, Martin Parr gave a solo talk. The talk was posted on the WAAPN blog: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
